The Dan Johnson Photography Blog

Welcome to the famous Dan Johnson Photography Blog! It's an offshoot of our main website and it's all about weddings and wedding photography in England.  Well OK, most of it is most of the time but there's also some music we like and stuff, plus the occasional rant. 

Best of all though if you're planning your own, there's heaps of handy hints here based on our experience of getting on for 400 weddings and civil partnerships, plus plenty of pictures from recent ones.  And there's four years' worth of posts in the archive for you to catch up on too ...

How to be a wedding photographer #1

One of the delights of living with Ann is that every now and then she returns from one of her trips to the charity shop in town with a present for me.  That’s the one she got me yesterday.  It is awesome.

Judging by the big hair and really bad frocks I guessed it was late 1970’s, but I was out by ten years.  It was in fact published in 1988, and this is the first one of its kind I’ve ever seen.  Fascinating is not the word …

Much of the advice given is sensible, if at times banal in the extreme, and it applies as much now as it did twenty years ago.  For example, the newcomer is reminded that wedding photography is generally reckoned to be one of the hardest photographic nuts to crack, and not only because you only get the one chance to get it right.  The author also points out that Catch 22 applies to the beginner -  you won’t book many weddings without a portfolio of weddings to show people, which of course you won’t have until you’ve shot a few weddings.  Apparently the answer is to fake a wedding, but more of that anon.

“You can learn a lot about wedding photography by making a few polite enquiries from local professionals about the services they offer and the prices they charge” it says here.

Yes, well.  Most of us who earn our living shooting weddings have served our time at wedding fairs, at which a wannabee or two will invariably strike up a conversation about some aspect of the business.  We’ve never had a problem with that, just as long as they were open about why they were asking.  Secret shoppers though are a different matter.

They’re actually hugely entertaining, and you can have a lot of harmless fun with one at a slow wedding fair.  There you are manning your stand, merrily engaging with all manner of brides from really sweet to really scary, when there in the distance you spot him.  And it’s usually a him, although he does sometimes send his other half or his daughter.  Sooner or later he’ll wander over, and as soon as the opportunity arises,  casually start flicking through one of the albums on display, feigning boredom.  When he does, your suspicions are confirmed, because any wedding photographer with half a brain can always spot another one who’s pretending not to be one.  Takes one to know one indeed.

Sometimes they even pretend to be getting married, as happened to my mate Kim only last weekend when he had a stand at a local wedding fair.  His secret shopper wasn’t very good at it though.  Maybe he’d forgotten that he’s based less than 20 miles from Kim and has a picture of himself on his website.  When we used to exhibit at wedding fairs ourselves, Ann and I came very close to having a small sign on our stand which simply said “Wedding photographers welcome.  No need to pretend you’re not one” but alas we never got it together to do that.

Anyhow, we now know from the book that we need to find out early on what we’re up against. Having done that, we can then move on to the next step, which is putting together a portfolio with which to stun potential punters.

Watch this space …

Chinese lanterns

Thinking of having a lantern release at your wedding … ?

The save the date video to end them all?

But we like this one too – mainly for the wonderful “Why won’t you just pick a font?”  …

The story behind the picture #1

This is one of those pictures which looks a lot better as an A3 size print than it does this size on a monitor.  I found it yesterday whilst thinning out some folders on one of the external HDD’s, and was reminded that when we used to schlep a big printed portfolio around, most people who saw this photo seemed a bit bemused by it.  Hence the idea for a series of occasional postings of the story behind some of the pictures we’ve used  in our portfolio …

This is in London, on Tower Hill, four years ago.  It’s the front of the old Port of London Authority building near Trinity House, at which Judith and David have just got themselves married.  As soon as we’ve finished the group shots outside Trinity House, Judith points to this building and says “Can we do some pictures over there with those columns?”.  “Of course we can” says I “It’s your day so we can do whatever you want!”.  So off we trot over the road.

It’s about 3.30 on a Friday afternoon, and no sooner have our couple got to the top of the steps than two blokes come out the door, walk between them and down the steps on their way home.  I’m still changing my lens, so I miss that shot, but I’m back in business by the time they get to the bottom and the one on the left shouts “Are you in Monday?” to his mate, who obligingly turns round in almost exactly the right spot …

January 30, 2010 - 12:32 am Mindy - Dan, This is a great shot. I enjoy your work!

Polly Pootles

polly pootles home pageWhen it comes to business names in the wedding industry, I wouldn’t be at all surprised if Polly Pootles ends up alongside Choccywoccydoodah and Inside Outside as one of the most memorable.  And if ever anybody was going to come up with a name like Polly Pootles, it had to be Helen.

Helen and Tom are a great couple whose wedding we shot 18 months ago.  It’s still the only one we’ve ever done at which everybody got driven round a safari park halfway through the day, and the only one at which, when asked by  the registrar if she took the bloke standing next to her as her husband, the bride looked at him, paused, and said “I suppose so”.  It was a very interesting wedding.

Now, the venerable Volkswagen in which Helen arrived for her own wedding has turned into a pristine Pootle, and is available for weddings.  Civil Partnerships and Bar  Mitzvahs too, no doubt.  Maybe even other occasions.

Everything you need to know about Polly Pootles is here

Unobtrusive

That’s a long shot from the back of the ceremony room at Syon Park a couple of years ago, and shows left to right a registrar, me, father of the bride and the videographer.  I’m being as unobtrusive as it’s possible to be whilst still getting the shot I need, in a situation where it’s not exactly easy to be unobtrusive

Wedding photographers like the word “unobtrusive”.

They like it very much.  A lot of them make a big thing of it in the blurb on their websites, and they do this in order to make it clear that they are not what’s known in the business as “all pink tie and tripod”.  Some couples do indeed like their photographer to be the centre of attention on their wedding day and are happy to risk being upstaged by Cheery Charlie Snapper and his incessant banter, but thankfully many are not, and unobtrusiveness is generally considered to be a Good Thing.

It’s also one of those things about which wedding photographers love to argue.  In the red corner we have those who are unobtrusive by virtue of the fact that they work alone and shoot in a very considered “decisive moment” style à la Henri Cartier-Bresson, though mainly on relatively long lenses, mainly from the sidelines and without the benefit of being French.

These guys (and the exponents of this style of shooting a wedding invariably are guys) usually deliver much if not all of their output in black and white, and tend to dismiss use of wider-angled lenses as generally far too in your face for comfort.  To their way of thinking, a photographer moving about working fairly close to their subjects is anything but unobtrusive, and must consequently both vex the couple and have a considerable impact upon their wedding.

Opposite them, in the blue corner, are those whose way of working is pretty much the exact opposite, in that they rely on working faster,  closer in when appropriate, and on keeping moving if necessary, particularly during drinks receptions.  To them, the “decisive moment” guys are at best insecure about what they’re doing and at worst elitist, but either way are guaranteed to spook the guests by sniping at them from the sidelines.  Blue-corner people tend to see red-corner people’s conversion of most if not all of their pictures to black and white as a cop-out too.

So are Ann and I “unobtrusive”, and if so – how?  Well, we certainly don’t make a big marketing thing out of being unobtrusive, but we think we are.  Pretty much.  At least we keep getting emails from clients saying they hardly noticed us when we were photographing their wedding, so I guess we must be.

One thing we’re not though is sideline snipers, although I must confess that actually, we used to be.  When we first started out shooting weddings.  Because we thought it was cool.   And besides, we couldn’t see how else you could photograph a wedding unobtrusively.

Then we found that we were missing shots.  And getting lots of backs of heads.  And creeping out the guests who noticed us trying to be unobtrusive like that.  So we learned, and we worked on finding our own way of being unobtrusive, which is all about shooting quickly and smiling and moving and anticipating and tuning into situations and stuff like that.

So yes, we too are unobtrusive.  We really are.  Even though there’s two of us.  And neither of us quite knows how we be unobtrusive …

January 20, 2010 - 8:02 am Tom Catchesides - Amen (but guilty of showing lots of B&W)

January 21, 2010 - 10:07 pm Guy Hearn - I'm in the green corner - shoot in black and white, and convert into colour later. Good post Dan - again :)

Drinks on the lawn

When planning your wedding while it’s freezing cold and the country’s ground to a halt because it snowed more than it usually does, it’s very easy to forget some of the characteristics of an English summer.

So here’s a reminder of a common sight at a summer wedding if it rained the day before – holes in the lawn and piles of temporarily-abandoned heels.

Should you worry about your guests sinking?  Well, it’s nice if there’s a terrace or some other hard surface in the right place if you fear that the older ladies might be embarrassed to kick off their shoes because of the appalling state of their feet, but that is actually their problem.  Why make it yours?

Given that they’ve just had the pleasure of seeing you get wed and are now drinking your booze,  anyone feeling put out because they’re sinking ought really to get over themselves and just be grateful they’re getting a free meal before much longer.

Seriously, if you’re getting to the stage where you’re starting to worry if some of your guests might sink into the lawn under the weight of a glass of champagne and a bijou concoction of toast, mystery paté and an olive, surely it’s time to crack open a bottle of halfway-decent red and go do something else?

Wedding timings #7

This was a civil ceremony and reception in the same venue, and there was actually nothing really exceptional happening here.  Planned time first, then actual …

Hair and Makeup arrives 10.30  10.50 Twenty minutes late is par for the course with a “Hair and Makeup Artiste” of the low-slung fake designer jeans, big lower back tattoo, muffin top and lots of bangles variety.

Put dress on 1.15  1.53 If the HMUA you’ve booked turns out to be oblivious to the passage of time, somebody needs to recognise this early on and put a rocket under her.  You do not have to sit there and trust that she knows what she’s doing when it’s patently obvious that she’s incompetent.

Leave for hotel  1.45 2.12 See above.

Bride arrives at venue to see registrar 2.15  2.42 By this point our bride was getting a bit stressed, but fortunately the groom had arrived in good time and everything at the venue was ready to rock.

Ceremony starts 2.30  2.58 Luckily the registrars didn’t have another wedding to go to straight after this one, so they didn’t have to rush the ceremony.

Drinks and photos  3 to 4.15  3.26 to 4.28 We’d actually finished the formals and portraits by 4.04

Guests start moving to dining room 4.15  4.28

Meal starts 4.30  4.48 No, the meal did not start 18 minutes late, it started 12 minutes early. The restaurant manager was in fact working all along to a 5pm start, having told both the couple and us 4.30 because he always assumes that all photographers take half an hour longer than they say they will.

First dance 8.00 8.43 The 8pm first dance time was calculated at the planning stage by adding the rule of thumb 2.5 hours for three courses and three speeches to a 4.30 sitdown then adding a generous hour slack to allow for the speeches dragging on and room turnround/band setup.  On the day we just had a combination of later than planned sitdown with longer than anticipated speeches and slower than expected room turnround and band setup.

Apart from the makeup muppett stressing the bride at the start of the show, the point to note with these timings is that a late start to the ceremony hardly ever means a late start to the meal.  It nearly always means less time before it for socialising with your guests, and more pressure on your photographers to whistle through that list of formal family photos which you were certain you’d have more than enough time for.

As usual, though, none of the guests would have noticed any of the timings slipping …

Diversions for a Friday #34

Gosh, I just realised we haven’t had one of these for ages, so here’s “With You” from Irya’s Playground …

And by a stroke of luck Mikael Colville-Andersen’s just posted a little video which lets me get something in about both cycling and snow.  It seems that the good folk of Copenhagen just ignore it and carry on as normal, albeit more slowly, and without resorting to studded tyres or anything special.  Love the way the bike-lane snowploughs dump the snow on the parked cars …

The top table wedding cake

I did actually post some of these pictures on the old blog, but when I came upon the files whilst furtling around this morning, it occurred to me to do another post about this cake but with bigger pictures this time, so here you go!

Angela and Terry got married in Dulwich in ‘06, and this was their amazing wedding cake, made by a lady called Sharon Forbes.  Well over 2ft long and with seated figures about 5″ tall, as far as I know it was all edible apart from the champagne glasses and Angela’s veil.

Terry omitted to tell us about this, so it came as a surprise when we rocked up to the reception at The Law Society, which though really nice is not exactly the most brightly-lit venue in town.  We therefore had very little time to photograph it, and not a lot of light to play with either.  Come to think of it, that was probably the last time we could have done with the tripod, which was ten minutes’ walk away in the car boot, where it always is unless we know we’re going to need it with us.

What these shots can’t convey though is how “lifelike” the figures were.  Given that the cakemaker had only pictures of those 15 people and written descriptions of what they’d be wearing, it really was uncanny how it was immediately obvious who was who.  The lady in green on the left in the third shot is Terry’s mum, who was overheard during the meal saying that having seen the cake, she now understood why Terry was insistent that she shouldn’t change her mind on the morning of the wedding and wear her purple jacket …